Photovoltaic system

Solar Power

Photovoltaic system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Photovoltaic power systems and components:

Top: solar string inverter and other BOS components • Solar array on rooftop in Hong Kong, China • BIPV on balcony in Helsinki, Finland

Middle: rooftop system in Boston, United States • Westmill solar park in the United Kingdom • Dual axis tracker with CPV modules • Topaz, one of the world’s largest solar power station, as seen from space

Bottom: commercial rooftop PV system of about 400 kWp • Power plant on Mt. Komekura, Japan • Solar PV system on Zugspitze, Germany’s highest mountain-top

A Photovoltaic system, also PV system or solar power system, is a power system designed to supply usable solar power by means of Photovoltaics. It consists of an arrangement of several components, including solar panels to absorb and convert sunlight into electricity, a solar inverter to convert the output from direct to alternating current, as well as mounting, cabling, and other electrical accessories to set up a working system. It may also use a solar tracking system to improve the system’s overall performance and include an integrated battery solution, as prices for storage devices are expected to decline. Strictly speaking, a solar array only encompasses the ensemble of solar panels, the visible part of the PV system, and does not include all the other hardware, often summarized as balance of system (BOS). As PV systems convert light directly into electricity, they are not to be confused with other solar technologies, such as concentrated solar power or solar thermal, used for heating and cooling.

PV systems range from small, rooftop-mounted or building-integrated systems with capacities from a few to several tens of kilowatts, to large utility-scale power stations of hundreds of megawatts. Nowadays, most PV systems are grid-connected, while off-grid or stand-alone systems account for a small portion of the market.

Operating silently and without any moving parts or environmental emissions, PV systems have developed from being niche market applications into a mature technology used for mainstream electricity generation. A rooftop system recoups the invested energy for its manufacturing and installation within 0.7 to 2 years and produces about 95 percent of net clean renewable energy over a 30-year service lifetime.[1]:30[2][3]

Due to the growth of Photovoltaics, prices for PV systems have rapidly declined since their introduction. However, they vary by market and the size of the system. In 2014, prices for residential 5-kilowatt systems in the United States were around $3.29 per watt,[4] while in the highly penetrated German market, prices for rooftop systems of up to 100 kW declined to €1.24 per watt.[5] Nowadays, solar PV modules account for less than half of the system’s overall cost,[6] leaving the rest to the remaining BOS-components and to soft costs, which include customer acquisition, permitting, inspection and interconnection, installation labor and financing costs.[7]:14


  • 1 Modern system
    • 1.1 Overview
    • 1.2 Grid-connection
    • 1.3 Scale of system
    • 1.4 Performance
  • 2 Components
    • 2.1 Solar array
      • 2.1.1 Module and efficiency
      • 2.1.2 Shading and dirt
      • 2.1.3 Insolation and energy
    • 2.2 Mounting
    • 2.3 Cabling
    • 2.4 Tracker
    • 2.5 Inverter
    • 2.6 Battery
    • 2.7 Monitoring and metering
  • 3 Other systems
    • 3.1 CPV
    • 3.2 Hybrid
    • 3.3 Floating solar arrays
    • 3.4 Direct current grid
    • 3.5 Standalone
  • 4 Costs and economy
    • 4.1 System cost 2013
    • 4.2 Learning curve
  • 5 Regulation
    • 5.1 Standardization
    • 5.2 National regulations
  • 6 Limitations
    • 6.1 Pollution and energy in PV production
    • 6.2 Impact on electricity network
    • 6.3 Implication onto electricity bill management and energy investment
  • 7 See also
  • 8 References
  • 9 External links

Modern system


Diagram of the possible components of a Photovoltaic system

A Photovoltaic system converts the sun’s radiation, in the form of light, into usable electricity. It comprises the solar array and the balance of system components. PV systems can be categorized by various aspects, such as, grid-connected vs. stand alone systems, building-integrated vs. rack-mounted systems, residential vs. utility systems, distributed vs. centralized systems, rooftop vs. ground-mounted systems, tracking vs. fixed-tilt systems, and new constructed vs. retrofitted systems. Other distinctions may include, systems with microinverters vs. central inverter, systems using crystalline silicon vs. thin-film technology, and systems with modules from Chinese vs. European and U.S.-manufacturers.

About 99 percent of all European and 90 percent of all U.S. solar power systems are connected to the electrical grid, while off-grid systems are somewhat more common in Australia and South Korea.[8]:14 PV systems rarely use battery storage. This may change, as government incentives for distributed energy storage are implemented and investments in storage solutions gradually become economically viable for small systems.[9][10] A typical residential solar array is rack-mounted on the roof, rather than integrated into the roof or facade of the building, which is significantly more expensive. Utility-scale solar power stations are ground-mounted, with fixed tilted solar panels rather than using expensive tracking devices. Crystalline silicon is the predominant material used in 90 percent of worldwide produced solar modules, while its rival thin-film has lost market-share.[1]:17–20 About 70 percent of all solar cells and modules are produced in China and Taiwan, only 5 percent by European and US-manufacturers.[1]:11–12 The installed capacity for both, small rooftop systems and large solar power stations is growing rapidly and in equal parts, although there is a notable trend towards utility-scale systems, as the focus on new installations is shifting away from Europe to sunnier regions, such as the Sunbelt in the U.S., which are less opposed to ground-mounted solar farms and cost-effectiveness is more emphasized by investors.[8]:43

Driven by advances in technology and increases in manufacturing scale and sophistication, the cost of Photovoltaics is declining continuously.[3] There are several million PV systems distributed all over the world, mostly in Europe, with 1.4 million systems in Germany alone[1]:5– as well as North America with 440,000 systems in the United States.[11] The energy conversion efficiency of a conventional solar module increased from 15 to 20 percent since 2004[1]:17 and a PV system recoups the energy needed for its manufacture in about 2 years. In exceptionally irradiated locations, or when thin-film technology is used, the so-called energy payback time decreases to one year or less.[1]:30–33 Net metering and financial incentives, such as preferential feed-in tariffs for solar-generated electricity, have also greatly supported installations of PV systems in many countries.[12] The levelised cost of electricity from large-scale PV systems has become competitive with conventional electricity sources in an expanding list of geographic regions, and grid parity has been achieved in about 30 different countries.[13][14][15]

As of 2015, the fast-growing global PV market is rapidly approaching the 200 GW mark – about 40 times the installed capacity in 2006.[16] These systems currently contribute about 1 percent to worldwide electricity generation. Top installers of PV systems in terms of capacity are currently China, Japan and the United States, while half of the world’s capacity is installed in Europe, with Germany and Italy supplying 7% to 8% of their respective domestic electricity consumption with solar PV.[17] The International Energy Agency expects solar power to become the world’s largest source of electricity by 2050, with solar Photovoltaics and concentrated solar thermal contributing 16% and 11% to the global demand, respectively.[7]


Main article: Grid-connected Photovoltaic power system

Schematics of a typical residential PV system

A grid connected system is connected to a larger independent grid (typically the public electricity grid) and feeds energy directly into the grid. This energy may be shared by a residential or commercial building before or after the revenue measurement point, depending on whether the credited energy production is calculated independently of the customer’s energy consumption (feed-in tariff) or only on the difference of energy (net metering). These systems vary in size from residential (2–10 kWp) to solar power stations (up to 10s of MWp). This is a form of decentralized electricity generation. Feeding electricity into the grid requires the transformation of DC into AC by a special, synchronising grid-tie inverter. In kilowatt-sized installations the DC side system voltage is as high as permitted (typically 1000 V except US residential 600 V) to limit ohmic losses. Most modules (60 or 72 crystalline silicon cells) generate 160 W to 300 W at 36 volts. It is sometimes necessary or desirable to connect the modules partially in parallel rather than all in series. An individual set of modules connected in series is known as a ‘string’.[18]

Scale of system

Photovoltaic systems are generally categorized into three distinct market segments: residential rooftop, commercial rooftop, and ground-mount utility-scale systems. Their capacities range from a few kilowatts to hundreds of megawatts. A typical residential system is around 10 kilowatts and mounted on a sloped roof, while commercial systems may reach a megawatt-scale and are generally installed on low-slope or even flat roofs. Although rooftop mounted systems are small and have a higher cost per watt than large utility-scale installations, they account for the largest share in the market. There is, however, a growing trend towards bigger utility-scale power plants, especially in the “sunbelt” region of the planet.[8]:43[19]


Main article: Photovoltaic power station

Perovo Solar Park in Ukraine

Large utility-scale solar parks or farms are power stations and capable of providing an energy supply to large numbers of consumers. Generated electricity is fed into the transmission grid powered by central generation plants (grid-connected or grid-tied plant), or combined with one, or many, domestic electricity generators to feed into a small electrical grid (hybrid plant). In rare cases generated electricity is stored or used directly by island/standalone plant.[20][21] PV systems are generally designed in order to ensure the highest energy yield for a given investment. Some large Photovoltaic power stations such as Solar Star, Waldpolenz Solar Park and Topaz Solar Farm cover tens or hundreds of hectares and have power outputs up to hundreds of megawatts.

Rooftop, mobile, and portable

Main article: Rooftop Photovoltaic power station

Rooftop system near Boston, USA.

A small PV system is capable of providing enough AC electricity to power a single home, or an isolated device in the form of AC or DC electric. Military and civilian Earth observation satellites, street lights, construction and traffic signs, electric cars, solar-powered tents,[22] and electric aircraft may contain integrated Photovoltaic systems to provide a primary or auxiliary power source in the form of AC or DC power, depending on the design and power demands. In 2013, rooftop systems accounted for 60 percent of worldwide installations. However, there is a trend away from rooftop and towards utility-scale PV systems, as the focus of new PV installations is also shifting from Europe to countries in the sunbelt region of the planet where opposition to ground-mounted solar farms is less accentuated.[8]:43 Portable and mobile PV systems provide electrical power independent of utility connections, for “off the grid” operation. Such systems are so commonly used on recreational vehicles and boats that there are retailers specializing in these applications[23] and products specifically targeted to them.[24][25] Since recreational vehicles (RV) normally carry batteries and operate lighting and other systems on nominally 12-volt DC power, RV systems normally operate in a voltage range that can charge 12-volt batteries directly, so addition of a PV system requires only panels, a charge controller, and wiring. Solar systems on recreation vehicles are usually constrained in wattage by the physical size of the RV’s roof space.[26]


Main article: Building-integrated Photovoltaics

BAPV wall near Barcelona, Spain

In urban and suburban areas, Photovoltaic arrays are often used on rooftops to supplement power use; often the building will have a connection to the power grid, in which case the energy produced by the PV array can be sold back to the utility in some sort of net metering agreement. Some utilities, use the rooftops of commercial customers and telephone poles to support their use of PV panels.[27] Solar trees are arrays that, as the name implies, mimic the look of trees, provide shade, and at night can function as street lights.


Further information: Photovoltaic system performance

Uncertainties in revenue over time relate mostly to the evaluation of the solar resource and to the performance of the system itself. In the best of cases, uncertainties are typically 4% for year-to-year climate variability, 5% for solar resource estimation (in a horizontal plane), 3% for estimation of irradiation in the plane of the array, 3% for power rating of modules, 2% for losses due to dirt and soiling, 1.5% for losses due to snow, and 5% for other sources of error. Identifying and reacting to manageable losses is critical for revenue and O&M efficiency. Monitoring of array performance may be part of contractual agreements between the array owner, the builder, and the utility purchasing the energy produced. A method to create “synthetic days” using readily available weather data and verification using the Open Solar Outdoors Test Field make it possible to predict Photovoltaic systems performance with high degrees of accuracy.[28] This method can be used to then determine loss mechanisms on a local scale – such as those from snow[29][30] or the effects of surface coatings (e.g. hydrophobic or hydrophilic) on soiling or snow losses.[31] (Although in heavy snow environments with severe ground interference can result in annual losses from snow of 30%.[32]) Access to the Internet has allowed a further improvement in energy monitoring and communication. Dedicated systems are available from a number of vendors. For solar PV systems that use microinverters (panel-level DC to AC conversion), module power data is automatically provided. Some systems allow setting performance alerts that trigger phone/email/text warnings when limits are reached. These solutions provide data for the system owner and the installer. Installers are able to remotely monitor multiple installations, and see at-a-glance the status of their entire installed base.


The balance of system components of a PV system (BOS) balance the power-generating subsystem of the solar array (left side) with the power-using side of the AC-household devices and the utility grid (right side).

A Photovoltaic system for residential, commercial, or industrial energy supply consists of the solar array and a number of components often summarized as the balance of system (BOS). This term is synonymous with “Balance of plant” q.v. BOS-components include power-conditioning equipment and structures for mounting, typically one or more DC to AC power converters, also known as inverters, an energy storage device, a racking system that supports the solar array, electrical wiring and interconnections, and mounting for other components.

Optionally, a balance of system may include any or all of the following: renewable energy credit revenue-grade meter, maximum power point tracker (MPPT), battery system and charger, GPS solar tracker, energy management software, solar irradiance sensors, anemometer, or task-specific accessories designed to meet specialized requirements for a system owner. In addition, a CPV system requires optical lenses or mirrors and sometimes a cooling system.

The terms “solar array” and “PV system” are often incorrectly used interchangeably, despite the fact that the solar array does not encompass the entire system. Moreover, “solar panel” is often used as a synonym for “solar module”, although a panel consists of a string of several modules. The term “solar system” is also an often used misnomer for a PV system.

Solar array

Further information: PV module

Fixed tilt solar array in of crystalline silicon panels in Canterbury, New Hampshire, United States

Solar array of a solar farm with a few thousand solar modules on the island of Majorca, Spain

The building blocks of a Photovoltaic system are solar cells. A solar cell is the electrical device that can directly convert photons energy into electricity. There are three technological generations of solar cells: the first generation (1G) of crystalline silicon cells (c-Si), the second generation (2G) of thin-film cells (such as CdTe, CIGS, Amorphous Silicon, and GaAs), and the third generation (3G) of organic, dye-sensitized, Perovskite and multijunction cells.[33][34]

Conventional c-Si solar cells, normally wired in series, are encapsulated in a solar module to protect them from the weather. The module consists of a tempered glass as cover, a soft and flexible encapsulant, a rear backsheet made of a weathering and fire-resistant material and an aluminium frame around the outer edge. Electrically connected and mounted on a supporting structure, solar modules build a string of modules, often called solar panel. A solar array consists of one or many such panels.[35] A Photovoltaic array, or solar array, is a linked collection of solar modules. The power that one module can produce is seldom enough to meet requirements of a home or a business, so the modules are linked together to form an array. Most PV arrays use an inverter to convert the DC power produced by the modules into alternating current that can power lights, motors, and other loads. The modules in a PV array are usually first connected in series to obtain the desired voltage; the individual strings are then connected in parallel to allow the system to produce more current. Solar panels are typically measured under STC (standard test conditions) or PTC (PVUSA test conditions), in watts.[36] Typical panel ratings range from less than 100 watts to over 400 watts.[37] The array rating consists of a summation of the panel ratings, in watts, kilowatts, or megawatts.

Module and efficiency

A typical 150 watt PV module is about a square meter in size. Such a module may be expected to produce 0.75  kilowatt-hour (kWh) every day, on average, after taking into account the weather and the latitude, for an insolation of 5 sun hours/day. Module output and life degraded by increased temperature. Allowing ambient air to flow over, and if possible behind, PV modules reduces this problem. Effective module lives are typically 25 years or more.[38] The payback period for an investment in a PV solar installation varies greatly and is typically less useful than a calculation of return on investment.[39] While it is typically calculated to be between 10 and 20 years, the financial payback period can be far shorter with incentives.[40]

Due to the low voltage of an individual solar cell (typically ca. 0.5V), several cells are wired (also see copper used in PV systems) in series in the manufacture of a “laminate”. The laminate is assembled into a protective weatherproof enclosure, thus making a Photovoltaic module or solar panel. Modules may then be strung together into a Photovoltaic array. In 2012, solar panels available for consumers have an efficiency of up to about 17%,[41] while commercially available panels can go as far as 27%. It has been recorded that a group from The Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems have created a cell that can reach 44.7% efficiency, which makes scientists’ hopes of reaching the 50% efficiency threshold a lot more feasible.[42][43][44][45]

Shading and dirt

Photovoltaic cell electrical output is extremely sensitive to shading.[46][47][48] When even a small portion of a cell, module, or array is shaded, with the remainder is in sunlight, the output falls dramatically due to internal ‘short-circuiting’ (the electrons reversing course through the shaded portion of the p-n junction). If the current drawn from the series string of cells is no greater than the current that can be produced by the shaded cell, the current (and so power) developed by the string is limited. If enough voltage is available from the other cells in a string, current will be forced through the cell by breaking down the junction in the shaded portion. This breakdown voltage in common cells is between 10 and 30 volts. Instead of adding to the power produced by the panel, the shaded cell absorbs power, turning it into heat. Since the reverse voltage of a shaded cell is much greater than the forward voltage of an illuminated cell, one shaded cell can absorb the power of many other cells in the string, disproportionately affecting panel output. For example, a shaded cell may drop 8 volts, instead of adding 0.5 volts, at a particular current level, thereby absorbing the power produced by 16 other cells.[49] It is thus important that a PV installation is not shaded by trees or other obstructions.

Several methods have been developed to determine shading losses from trees to PV systems over both large regions using LiDAR,[50] but also at an individual system level using sketchup.[51] Most modules have bypass diodes between each cell or string of cells that minimize the effects of shading and only lose the power of the shaded portion of the array. The main job of the bypass diode is to eliminate hot spots that form on cells that can cause further damage to the array, and cause fires.

Sunlight can be absorbed by dust, snow, or other impurities at the surface of the module (collectively referred to as soiling). Soiling reduces the light that strikes the cells, which in turn reduces the power output of the PV system. Soiling losses aggregate over time, and can become large without adequate cleaning. In 2018, the global annual energy loss due to soiling was estimated to at least 3 % – 4 %.[52] However, soiling losses varies largely from region to region, and within regions.[53][54][55][56] Maintaining a clean module surface will increase output performance over the life of the PV system. In one study performed in a snow-rich area (Ontario), cleaning flat mounted solar panels after 15 months increased their output by almost 100%. However, 5° tilted arrays were adequately cleaned by rainwater.[30][57] In many cases, especially in arid regions, or in locations in close proximity to deserts, roads, industry, or agriculture, regular cleaning of the solar panels is cost-effective. In 2018, the estimated soiling-induced revenue loss was estimated to between 5 and 7 billion euros.[52]

Insolation and energy

Global solar resource

Solar insolation is made up of direct, diffuse, and reflected radiation. The absorption factor of a PV cell is defined as the fraction of incident solar irradiance that is absorbed by the cell.[58] At high noon on a cloudless day at the equator, the power of the sun is about 1 kW/m2,[59] on the Earth’s surface, to a plane that is perpendicular to the sun’s rays. As such, PV arrays can track the sun through each day to greatly enhance energy collection. However, tracking devices add cost, and require maintenance, so it is more common for PV arrays to have fixed mounts that tilt the array and face solar noon (approximately due south in the Northern Hemisphere or due north in the Southern Hemisphere). The tilt angle, from horizontal, can be varied for season,[60] but if fixed, should be set to give optimal array output during the peak electrical demand portion of a typical year for a stand-alone system. This optimal module tilt angle is not necessarily identical to the tilt angle for maximum annual array energy output.[61] The optimization of the Photovoltaic system for a specific environment can be complicated as issues of solar flux, soiling, and snow losses should be taken into effect. In addition, later work has shown that spectral effects can play a role in optimal Photovoltaic material selection. For example, the spectral albedo can play a significant role in output depending on the surface around the Photovoltaic system[62] and the type of solar cell material.[63] For the weather and latitudes of the United States and Europe, typical insolation ranges from 4 kWh/m2/day in northern climes to 6.5 kWh/m2/day in the sunniest regions. A Photovoltaic installation in the northern latitudes of Europe or the United States may expect to produce 1 kWh/m2/day. A typical 1 kW Photovoltaic installation in Australia or the southern latitudes of Europe or United States, may produce 3.5–5 kWh per day, dependent on location, orientation, tilt, insolation and other factors. In the Sahara desert, with less cloud cover and a better solar angle, one could ideally obtain closer to 8.3 kWh/m2/day provided the nearly ever present wind would not blow sand onto the units. The area of the Sahara desert is over 9 million km2. 90,600 km2, or about 1%, could generate as much electricity as all of the world’s power plants combined.[64]


Main article: Photovoltaic mounting system

A 23-year-old ground mounted PV system from the 1980s on a North Frisian Island, Germany. The modules conversion efficiency was only 12%.

Modules are assembled into arrays on some kind of mounting system, which may be classified as ground mount, roof mount or pole mount. For solar parks a large rack is mounted on the ground, and the modules mounted on the rack. For buildings, many different racks have been devised for pitched roofs. For flat roofs, racks, bins and building integrated solutions are used. Solar panel racks mounted on top of poles can be stationary or moving, see Trackers below. Side-of-pole mounts are suitable for situations where a pole has something else mounted at its top, such as a light fixture or an antenna. Pole mounting raises what would otherwise be a ground mounted array above weed shadows and livestock, and may satisfy electrical code requirements regarding inaccessibility of exposed wiring. Pole mounted panels are open to more cooling air on their underside, which increases performance. A multiplicity of pole top racks can be formed into a parking carport or other shade structure. A rack which does not follow the sun from left to right may allow seasonal adjustment up or down.


Main articles: Solar cable and Electrical wiring

Due to their outdoor usage, solar cables are designed to be resistant against UV radiation and extremely high temperature fluctuations and are generally unaffected by the weather. Standards specifying the usage of electrical wiring in PV systems include the IEC 60364 by the International Electrotechnical Commission, in section 712 “Solar Photovoltaic (PV) power supply systems”, the British Standard BS 7671, incorporating regulations relating to microgeneration and Photovoltaic systems, and the US UL4703 standard, in subject 4703 “Photovoltaic Wire”.


Main article: Solar tracker

A 1998 model of a passive solar tracker, viewed from underneath.

A solar tracking system tilts a solar panel throughout the day. Depending on the type of tracking system, the panel is either aimed directly at the sun or the brightest area of a partly clouded sky. Trackers greatly enhance early morning and late afternoon performance, increasing the total amount of power produced by a system by about 20–25% for a single axis tracker and about 30% or more for a dual axis tracker, depending on latitude.[65][66] Trackers are effective in regions that receive a large portion of sunlight directly. In diffuse light (i.e. under cloud or fog), tracking has little or no value. Because most concentrated Photovoltaics systems are very sensitive to the sunlight’s angle, tracking systems allow them to produce useful power for more than a brief period each day.[67] Tracking systems improve performance for two main reasons. First, when a solar panel is perpendicular to the sunlight, it receives more light on its surface than if it were angled. Second, direct light is used more efficiently than angled light.[68] Special Anti-reflective coatings can improve solar panel efficiency for direct and angled light, somewhat reducing the benefit of tracking.[69]

Trackers and sensors to optimise the performance are often seen as optional, but they can increase viable output by up to 45%.[70] Arrays that approach or exceed one megawatt often use solar trackers. Considering clouds, and the fact that most of the world is not on the equator, and that the sun sets in the evening, the correct measure of solar power is insolation – the average number of kilowatt-hours per square meter per day. For the weather and latitudes of the United States and Europe, typical insolation ranges from 2.26 kWh/m2/day in northern climes to 5.61 kWh/m2/day in the sunniest regions.[71][72]

For large systems, the energy gained by using tracking systems can outweigh the added complexity. For very large systems, the added maintenance of tracking is a substantial detriment.[73] Tracking is not required for flat panel and low-concentration Photovoltaic systems. For high-concentration Photovoltaic systems, dual axis tracking is a necessity.[74] Pricing trends affect the balance between adding more stationary solar panels versus having fewer panels that track.

As pricing, reliability and performance of single-axis trackers have improved, the systems have been installed in an increasing percentage of utility-scale projects. According to data from WoodMackenzie/GTM Research, global solar tracker shipments hit a record 14.5 gigawatts in 2017. This represents growth of 32 percent year-over-year, with similar or greater growth projected as large-scale solar deployment accelerates.[75]


Main articles: Solar inverter, Solar micro-inverter, and Power inverter

Central inverter with AC and DC disconnects (on the side), monitoring gateway, transformer isolation and interactive LCD.

String inverter (left), generation meter, and AC disconnect (right). A modern 2013 installation in Vermont, United States.

Systems designed to deliver alternating current (AC), such as grid-connected applications need an inverter to convert the direct current (DC) from the solar modules to AC. Grid connected inverters must supply AC electricity in sinusoidal form, synchronized to the grid frequency, limit feed in voltage to no higher than the grid voltage and disconnect from the grid if the grid voltage is turned off.[76] Islanding inverters need only produce regulated voltages and frequencies in a sinusoidal waveshape as no synchronisation or co-ordination with grid supplies is required.

A solar inverter may connect to a string of solar panels. In some installations a solar micro-inverter is connected at each solar panel.[77] For safety reasons a circuit breaker is provided both on the AC and DC side to enable maintenance. AC output may be connected through an electricity meter into the public grid.[78] The number of modules in the system determines the total DC watts capable of being generated by the solar array; however, the inverter ultimately governs the amount of AC watts that can be distributed for consumption. For example, a PV system comprising 11 kilowatts DC (kWDC) worth of PV modules, paired with one 10-kilowatt AC (kWAC) inverter, will be limited to the inverter’s output of 10 kW. As of 2019, conversion efficiency for state-of-the-art converters reached more than 98 percent. While string inverters are used in residential to medium-sized commercial PV systems, central inverters cover the large commercial and utility-scale market. Market-share for central and string inverters are about 44 percent and 52 percent, respectively, with less than 1 percent for micro-inverters.[79]

Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) is a technique that grid connected inverters use to get the maximum possible power from the Photovoltaic array. In order to do so, the inverter’s MPPT system digitally samples the solar array’s ever changing power output and applies the proper resistance to find the optimal maximum power point.[80]

Anti-islanding is a protection mechanism to immediately shut down the inverter, preventing it from generating AC power when the connection to the load no longer exists. This happens, for example, in the case of a blackout. Without this protection, the supply line would become an “island” with power surrounded by a “sea” of unpowered lines, as the solar array continues to deliver DC power during the power outage. Islanding is a hazard to utility workers, who may not realize that an AC circuit is still powered, and it may prevent automatic re-connection of devices.[81] Anti-Islanding feature is not required for complete Off-Grid Systems.

Inverter/Converter Market in 2019
Type Power Efficiency(a) Market
 String inverter up to 150 kWp(c) 98% 61.6% Cost(b) €0.05-0.17 per watt-peak. Easy to replace.
 Central inverter above 80 kWp 98.5% 36.7% €0.04 per watt-peak. High reliability. Often sold along with a service contract.
 Micro-inverter module power range 90%–97% 1.7% €0.29 per watt-peak. Ease-of-replacement concerns.
 DC/DC converter
(Power optimizer)
module power range 99.5% 5.1% €0.08 per watt-peak. Ease-of-replacement concerns. Inverter is still needed.
Source: data by IHS Markit 2020, remarks by Fraunhofer ISE 2020, from: Photovoltaics Report 2020, p. 39, PDF[79]
Notes: (a)best efficiencies displayed, (b)market-share and cost per watt are estimated, (c)kWp = kilowatt-peak, (d) Total Market Share is greater than 100% because DC/DC converters are required to be paired with string inverters


Main articles: Rechargeable battery and Battery (electricity)

Although still expensive, PV systems increasingly use rechargeable batteries to store a surplus to be later used at night. Batteries used for grid-storage also stabilize the electrical grid by leveling out peak loads, and play an important role in a smart grid, as they can charge during periods of low demand and feed their stored energy into the grid when demand is high.

Common battery technologies used in today’s PV systems include the valve regulated lead-acid battery– a modified version of the conventional lead–acid battery, nickel–cadmium and lithium-ion batteries. Compared to the other types, lead-acid batteries have a shorter lifetime and lower energy density. However, due to their high reliability, low self discharge as well as low investment and maintenance costs, they are currently the predominant technology used in small-scale, residential PV systems, as lithium-ion batteries are still being developed and about 3.5 times as expensive as lead-acid batteries. Furthermore, as storage devices for PV systems are stationary, the lower energy and power density and therefore higher weight of lead-acid batteries are not as critical as, for example, in electric transportation[9]:4,9 Other rechargeable batteries considered for distributed PV systems include sodium–sulfur and vanadium redox batteries, two prominent types of a molten salt and a flow battery, respectively.[9]:4 In 2015, Tesla Motors launched the Powerwall, a rechargeable lithium-ion battery with the aim to revolutionize energy consumption.[82]

PV systems with an integrated battery solution also need a charge controller, as the varying voltage and current from the solar array requires constant adjustment to prevent damage from overcharging.[83] Basic charge controllers may simply turn the PV panels on and off, or may meter out pulses of energy as needed, a strategy called PWM or pulse-width modulation. More advanced charge controllers will incorporate MPPT logic into their battery charging algorithms. Charge controllers may also divert energy to some purpose other than battery charging. Rather than simply shut off the free PV energy when not needed, a user may choose to heat air or water once the battery is full.

Monitoring and metering

Main articles: Net metering, Energy metering, and Smart meter

The metering must be able to accumulate energy units in both directions, or two meters must be used. Many meters accumulate bidirectionally, some systems use two meters, but a unidirectional meter (with detent) will not accumulate energy from any resultant feed into the grid.[84] In some countries, for installations over 30 kWp a frequency and a voltage monitor with disconnection of all phases is required. This is done where more solar power is being generated than can be accommodated by the utility, and the excess can not either be exported or stored. Grid operators historically have needed to provide transmission lines and generation capacity. Now they need to also provide storage. This is normally hydro-storage, but other means of storage are used. Initially storage was used so that baseload generators could operate at full output. With variable renewable energy, storage is needed to allow power generation whenever it is available, and consumption whenever needed.

The two variables a grid operator have are storing electricity for when it is needed, or transmitting it to where it is needed. If both of those fail, installations over 30kWp can automatically shut down, although in practice all inverters maintain voltage regulation and stop supplying power if the load is inadequate. Grid operators have the option of curtailing excess generation from large systems, although this is more commonly done with wind power than solar power, and results in a substantial loss of revenue.[85] Three-phase inverters have the unique option of supplying reactive power which can be advantageous in matching load requirements.[86]

Photovoltaic systems need to be monitored to detect breakdown and optimize operation. There are several Photovoltaic monitoring strategies depending on the output of the installation and its nature. Monitoring can be performed on site or remotely. It can measure production only, retrieve all the data from the inverter or retrieve all of the data from the communicating equipment (probes, meters, etc.). Monitoring tools can be dedicated to supervision only or offer additional functions. Individual inverters and battery charge controllers may include monitoring using manufacturer specific protocols and software.[87] Energy metering of an inverter may be of limited accuracy and not suitable for revenue metering purposes. A third-party data acquisition system can monitor multiple inverters, using the inverter manufacturer’s protocols, and also acquire weather-related information. Independent smart meters may measure the total energy production of a PV array system. Separate measures such as satellite image analysis or a solar radiation meter (a pyranometer) can be used to estimate total insolation for comparison.[88] Data collected from a monitoring system can be displayed remotely over the World Wide Web, such as OSOTF.[89][90][91][92]

Other systems

This section includes systems that are either highly specialized and uncommon or still an emerging new technology with limited significance. However, standalone or off-grid systems take a special place. They were the most common type of systems during the 1980s and 1990s, when PV technology was still very expensive and a pure niche market of small scale applications. Only in places where no electrical grid was available, they were economically viable. Although new stand-alone systems are still being deployed all around the world, their contribution to the overall installed Photovoltaic capacity is decreasing. In Europe, off-grid systems account for 1 percent of installed capacity. In the United States, they account for about 10 percent. Off-grid systems are still common in Australia and South Korea, and in many developing countries.[8]:14


Main article: Concentrator Photovoltaics

Concentrator Photovoltaic (CPV) in Catalonia, Spain

Concentrator Photovoltaics (CPV) and high concentrator Photovoltaic (HCPV) systems use optical lenses or curved mirrors to concentrate sunlight onto small but highly efficient solar cells. Besides concentrating optics, CPV systems sometime use solar trackers and cooling systems and are more expensive.

Especially HCPV systems are best suited in location with high solar irradiance, concentrating sunlight up to 400 times or more, with efficiencies of 24–28 percent, exceeding those of regular systems. Various designs of systems are commercially available but not very common. However, ongoing research and development is taking place.[1]:26

CPV is often confused with CSP (concentrated solar power) that does not use Photovoltaics. Both technologies favor locations that receive much sunlight and are directly competing with each other.


A wind-solar PV hybrid system

A hybrid system combines PV with other forms of generation, usually a diesel generator. Biogas is also used. The other form of generation may be a type able to modulate power output as a function of demand. However more than one renewable form of energy may be used e.g. wind. The Photovoltaic power generation serves to reduce the consumption of non renewable fuel. Hybrid systems are most often found on islands. Pellworm island in Germany and Kythnos island in Greece are notable examples (both are combined with wind).[93][94] The Kythnos plant has reduced diesel consumption by 11.2%.[95]

In 2015, a case-study conducted in seven countries concluded that in all cases generating costs can be reduced by hybridising mini-grids and isolated grids. However, financing costs for such hybrids are crucial and largely depend on the ownership structure of the power plant. While cost reductions for state-owned utilities can be significant, the study also identified economic benefits to be insignificant or even negative for non-public utilities, such as independent power producers.[96][97]

There has also been work showing that the PV penetration limit can be increased by deploying a distributed network of PV+CHP hybrid systems in the U.S.[98] The temporal distribution of solar flux, electrical and heating requirements for representative U.S. single family residences were analyzed and the results clearly show that hybridizing CHP with PV can enable additional PV deployment above what is possible with a conventional centralized electric generation system. This theory was reconfirmed with numerical simulations using per second solar flux data to determine that the necessary battery backup to provide for such a hybrid system is possible with relatively small and inexpensive battery systems.[99] In addition, large PV+CHP systems are possible for institutional buildings, which again provide back up for intermittent PV and reduce CHP runtime.[100]

  • PVT system (hybrid PV/T), also known as Photovoltaic thermal hybrid solar collectors convert solar radiation into thermal and electrical energy. Such a system combines a solar (PV) module with a solar thermal collector in a complementary way.
  • CPVT system. A concentrated Photovoltaic thermal hybrid (CPVT) system is similar to a PVT system. It uses concentrated Photovoltaics (CPV) instead of conventional PV technology, and combines it with a solar thermal collector.
  • CPV/CSP system. A novel solar CPV/CSP hybrid system has been proposed, combining concentrator Photovoltaics with the non-PV technology of concentrated solar power (CSP), or also known as concentrated solar thermal.[101]
  • PV diesel system. It combines a Photovoltaic system with a diesel generator.[102] Combinations with other renewables are possible and include wind turbines.[103]

Floating solar arrays

Floating solar arrays are PV systems that float on the surface of drinking water reservoirs, quarry lakes, irrigation canals or remediation and tailing ponds. These systems are called “floatovoltaics” when used only for electrical production or “aquavoltaics” when such systems are used to synergistically enhance aquaculture.[104] A small number of such systems exist in France, India, Japan, South Korea, the United Kingdom, Singapore and the United States.[105][106][107][108][109]

The systems are said to have advantages over Photovoltaics on land. The cost of land is more expensive, and there are fewer rules and regulations for structures built on bodies of water not used for recreation. Unlike most land-based solar plants, floating arrays can be unobtrusive because they are hidden from public view. They achieve higher efficiencies than PV panels on land, because water cools the panels. The panels have a special coating to prevent rust or corrosion.[110]

In May 2008, the Far Niente Winery in Oakville, California, pioneered the world’s first floatovoltaic system by installing 994 solar PV modules with a total capacity of 477 kW onto 130 pontoons and floating them on the winery’s irrigation pond.[111] The primary benefit of such a system is that it avoids the need to sacrifice valuable land area that could be used for another purpose. In the case of the Far Niente Winery, it saved 0.75 acres (0.30 ha) that would have been required for a land-based system.[112] Another benefit of a floatovoltaic system is that the panels are kept at a cooler temperature than they would be on land, leading to a higher efficiency of solar energy conversion. The floating PV array also reduces the amount of water lost through evaporation and inhibits the growth of algae.[113]

Utility-scale floating PV farms are starting to be built. The multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer Kyocera will develop the world’s largest, a 13.4 MW farm on the reservoir above Yamakura Dam in Chiba Prefecture[114] using 50,000 solar panels.[115][116] Salt-water resistant floating farms are also being considered for ocean use, with experiments in Thailand.[117] The largest so far announced floatovoltaic project is a 350 MW power station in the Amazon region of Brazil.[118]

Direct current grid

DC grids are found in electric powered transport: railways trams and trolleybuses. A few pilot plants for such applications have been built, such as the tram depots in Hannover Leinhausen, using Photovoltaic contributors[119] and Geneva (Bachet de Pesay).[120] The 150 kWp Geneva site feeds 600 V DC directly into the tram/trolleybus electricity network whereas before it provided about 15% of the electricity at its opening in 1999.


A stand-alone or off-grid system is not connected to the electrical grid. Standalone systems vary widely in size and application from wristwatches or calculators to remote buildings or spacecraft. If the load is to be supplied independently of solar insolation, the generated power is stored and buffered with a battery.[121] In non-portable applications where weight is not an issue, such as in buildings, lead acid batteries are most commonly used for their low cost and tolerance for abuse.

A charge controller may be incorporated in the system to avoid battery damage by excessive charging or discharging. It may also help to optimize production from the solar array using a maximum power point tracking technique (MPPT). However, in simple PV systems where the PV module voltage is matched to the battery voltage, the use of MPPT electronics is generally considered unnecessary, since the battery voltage is stable enough to provide near-maximum power collection from the PV module. In small devices (e.g. calculators, parking meters) only direct current (DC) is consumed. In larger systems (e.g. buildings, remote water pumps) AC is usually required. To convert the DC from the modules or batteries into AC, an inverter is used.

In agricultural settings, the array may be used to directly power DC pumps, without the need for an inverter. In remote settings such as mountainous areas, islands, or other places where a power grid is unavailable, solar arrays can be used as the sole source of electricity, usually by charging a storage battery. Stand-alone systems closely relate to microgeneration and distributed generation.

  • Pico PV systems

The smallest, often portable Photovoltaic systems are called pico solar PV systems, or pico solar. They mostly combine a rechargeable battery and charge controller, with a very small PV panel. The panel’s nominal capacity is just a few watt-peak (1–10 Wp) and its area less than 0.1 square metres (1 sq ft) in size. A large range of different applications can be solar powered such as music players, fans, portable lamps, security lights, solar lighting kits, solar lanterns and street light (see below), phone chargers, radios, or even small, seven-inch LCD televisions, that run on less than ten watts. As it is the case for power generation from pico hydro, pico PV systems are useful in small, rural communities that require only a small amount of electricity. Since the efficiency of many appliances have improved considerably, in particular due to the usage of LED lights and efficient rechargeable batteries, pico solar has become an affordable alternative, especially in the developing world.[122] The metric prefix pico- stands for a trillionth to indicate the smallness of the system’s electric power.

  • Solar street lights

Solar street lights raised light sources which are powered by Photovoltaic panels generally mounted on the lighting structure. The solar array of such off-grid PV system charges a rechargeable battery, which powers a fluorescent or LED lamp during the night. Solar street lights are stand-alone power systems, and have the advantage of savings on trenching, landscaping, and maintenance costs, as well as on the electric bills, despite their higher initial cost compared to conventional street lighting. They are designed with sufficiently large batteries to ensure operation for at least a week and even in the worst situation, they are expected to dim only slightly.

  • Telecommunication and signaling

Solar PV power is ideally suited for telecommunication applications such as local telephone exchange, radio and TV broadcasting, microwave and other forms of electronic communication links. In most telecommunication application, storage batteries are already in use and the electrical system is basically DC. In hilly and mountainous terrain, radio and TV signals may not reach as they get blocked or reflected back due to undulating terrain. At these locations, low power transmitters are installed to receive and retransmit the signal for local population.[123]

  • Solar vehicles

Solar vehicle, whether ground, water, air or space vehicles may obtain some or all of the energy required for their operation from the sun. Surface vehicles generally require higher power levels than can be sustained by a practically sized solar array, so a battery assists in meeting peak power demand, and the solar array recharges it. Space vehicles have successfully used solar Photovoltaic systems for years of operation, eliminating the weight of fuel or primary batteries.

  • Solar pumps

One of the most cost effective solar applications is a solar powered pump, as it is far cheaper to purchase a solar panel than it is to run power lines.[124][125][126] They often meet a need for water beyond the reach of power lines, taking the place of a windmill or windpump. One common application is the filling of livestock watering tanks, so that grazing cattle may drink. Another is the refilling of drinking water storage tanks on remote or self-sufficient homes.

  • Spacecraft

Solar panels on spacecraft have been one of the first applications of Photovoltaics since the launch of Vanguard 1 in 1958, the first satellite to use solar cells. Contrary to Sputnik, the first artificial satellite to orbit the planet, that ran out of batteries within 21 days due to the lack of solar-power, most modern communications satellites and space probes in the inner solar system rely on the use of solar panels to derive electricity from sunlight.[127][128]

  • Do it yourself community

With agrowing interest in environmentally friendly green energy, hobbyists in the DIY-community have endeavored to build their own solar PV systems from kits[129] or partly DIY.[130] Usually, the DIY-community uses inexpensive[131] or high efficiency systems[132] (such as those with solar tracking) to generate their own power. As a result, the DIY-systems often end up cheaper than their commercial counterparts.[133] Often the system is also connected to the regular power grid, using net metering instead of a battery for backup. These systems usually generate power amount of ~2 kW or less. Through the internet, the community is now able to obtain plans to (partly) construct the system and there is a growing trend toward building them for domestic requirements.

Costs and economy

See also: Photovoltaics § Economics

Median installed system prices for residential PV Systems
in Japan, Germany and the United States ($/W)

History of solar rooftop prices 2006–2013. Comparison in US$ per installed watt.[134][135]

The cost of producing photovotaic cells has dropped because of economies of scale in production and technological advances in manufacturing. For large-scale installations, prices below $1.00 per watt were common by 2012.[136] A price decrease of 50% had been achieved in Europe from 2006 to 2011 and there is a potential to lower the generation cost by 50% by 2020.[137] Crystal silicon solar cells have largely been replaced by less expensive multicrystalline silicon solar cells, and thin film silicon solar cells have also been developed at lower costs of production. Although they are reduced in energy conversion efficiency from single crystalline “siwafers”, they are also much easier to produce at comparably lower costs.[138]

The table below shows the total (average) cost in US cents per kWh of electricity generated by a Photovoltaic system.[139][140] The row headings on the left show the total cost, per peak kilowatt (kWp), of a Photovoltaic installation. Photovoltaic system costs have been declining and in Germany, for example, were reported to have fallen to USD 1389/kWp by the end of 2014.[141] The column headings across the top refer to the annual energy output in kWh expected from each installed kWp. This varies by geographic region because the average insolation depends on the average cloudiness and the thickness of atmosphere traversed by the sunlight. It also depends on the path of the sun relative to the panel and the horizon. Panels are usually mounted at an angle based on latitude, and often they are adjusted seasonally to meet the changing solar declination. Solar tracking can also be utilized to access even more perpendicular sunlight, thereby raising the total energy output.

The calculated values in the table reflect the total (average) cost in cents per kWh produced. They assume a 10% total capital cost (for instance 4% interest rate, 1% operating and maintenance cost,[142] and depreciation of the capital outlay over 20 years). Normally, Photovoltaic modules have a 25-year warranty.[143][144]

Cost of generated kilowatt-hour by a PV-System (US¢/kWh)
depending on solar radiation and installation cost during 20 years of operation
cost in
$ per watt
Insolation annually generated kilowatt-hours per installed kW-capacity (kWh/(kWp•y))
2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800
$0.20 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.5
$0.60 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.8 4.3 5.0 6.0 7.5
$1.00 4.2 4.5 5.0 5.6 6.3 7.1 8.3 10.0 12.5
$1.40 5.8 6.4 7.0 7.8 8.8 10.0 11.7 14.0 17.5
$1.80 7.5 8.2 9.0 10.0 11.3 12.9 15.0 18.0 22.5
$2.20 9.2 10.0 11.0 12.2 13.8 15.7 18.3 22.0 27.5
$2.60 10.8 11.8 13.0 14.4 16.3 18.6 21.7 26.0 32.5
$3.00 12.5 13.6 15.0 16.7 18.8 21.4 25.0 30.0 37.5
$3.40 14.2 15.5 17.0 18.9 21.3 24.3 28.3 34.0 42.5
$3.80 15.8 17.3 19.0 21.1 23.8 27.1 31.7 38.0 47.5
$4.20 17.5 19.1 21.0 23.3 26.3 30.0 35.0 42.0 52.5
$4.60 19.2 20.9 23.0 25.6 28.8 32.9 38.3 46.0 57.5
$5.00 20.8 22.7 25.0 27.8 31.3 35.7 41.7 50.0 62.5
USA Japan Germany   Small rooftop system cost and avg. insolation applied to data table, in 2013


1.       Cost per watt for rooftop system in 2013: Japan $4.64,[134] United States $4.92,[134] and Germany $2.05[135]

2.       Generated kilowatt-hour per installed watt-peak, based on average insolation for Japan (1500 kWh/m2/year), United States (5.0 to 5.5 kWh/m2/day),[145] and Germany (1000 to 1200 kWh/m2/year).

3.       A 2013 study by the Fraunhofer ISE concludes LCOE cost for a small PV system to be $0.16 (€0.12) rather than $0.22 per kilowatt-hour as shown in table (Germany).

System cost 2013

In its 2014 edition of the “Technology Roadmap: Solar Photovoltaic Energy” report, the International Energy Agency (IEA) published prices in US$ per watt for residential, commercial and utility-scale PV systems for eight major markets in 2013.[7]

Typical PV system prices in 2013 in selected countries (USD)
USD/W Australia China France Germany Italy Japan United Kingdom United States
 Residential 1.8 1.5 4.1 2.4 2.8 4.2 2.8 4.9
 Commercial 1.7 1.4 2.7 1.8 1.9 3.6 2.4 4.5
 Utility-scale 2.0 1.4 2.2 1.4 1.5 2.9 1.9 3.3
Source: IEA – Technology Roadmap: Solar Photovoltaic Energy report[7]:15

Learning curve

Photovoltaic systems demonstrate a learning curve in terms of levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), reducing its cost per kWh by 32.6% for every doubling of capacity.[146][147][148] From the data of LCOE and cumulative installed capacity from International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) from 2010 to 2017,[147][148] the learning curve equation for Photovoltaic systems is given as[146]

  • LCOE : levelized cost of electricity (in USD/kWh)
  • Capacity : cumulative installed capacity of Photovoltaic systems (in MW)



Increasing use of Photovoltaic systems and integration of Photovoltaic power into existing structures and techniques of supply and distribution increases the need for general standards and definitions for Photovoltaic components and systems. The standards are compiled at the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and apply to efficiency, durability and safety of cells, modules, simulation programs, plug connectors and cables, mounting systems, overall efficiency of inverters etc.[149]

National regulations

United Kingdom

In the UK, PV installations are generally considered permitted development and don’t require planning permission. If the property is listed or in a designated area (National Park, Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, Site of Special Scientific Interest or Norfolk Broads) then planning permission is required.[150]

United States

In the United States, article 690 of the National Electric Code provides general guidelines for the installation of Photovoltaic systems; these may be superseded by local laws and regulations. Often a permit is required necessitating plan submissions and structural calculations before work may begin. Additionally, many locales require the work to be performed under the guidance of a licensed electrician.

In the United States, the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) will review designs and issue permits, before construction can lawfully begin. Electrical installation practices must comply with standards set forth within the National Electrical Code (NEC) and be inspected by the AHJ to ensure compliance with building code, electrical code, and fire safety code. Jurisdictions may require that equipment has been tested, certified, listed, and labeled by at least one of the Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories (NRTL). .[151] In the US, many localities require a permit to install a Photovoltaic system. A grid-tied system normally requires a licensed electrician to connect between the system and the grid-connected wiring of the building.[152] Installers who meet these qualifications are located in almost every state.[151] Several states prohibit homeowners’ associations from restricting solar devices.[153][154][155]


Although Spain generates around 40% of its electricity via Photovoltaic and other renewable energy sources, and cities such as Huelva and Seville boast nearly 3,000 hours of sunshine per year, in 2013 Spain issued a solar tax to account for the debt created by the investment done by the Spanish government. Those who do not connect to the grid can face up to a fine of 30 million euros (US$40 million).[156][157] Such measures were finally withdrawn by 2018, when new legislation was introduced banning any taxes on renewable energy self-consumption.[158]


Pollution and energy in PV production

PV has been a well-known method of generating clean, emission free electricity. PV systems are often made of PV modules and inverter (changing DC to AC). PV modules are mainly made of PV cells, which has no fundamental difference to the material for making computer chips. The process of producing PV cells (computer chips) is energy intensive and involves highly poisonous and environmental toxic chemicals. There are few PV manufacturing plants around the world producing PV modules with energy produced from PV. This measure greatly reduces the carbon footprint during the manufacturing process. Managing the chemicals used in the manufacturing process is subject to the factories’ local laws and regulations.

Impact on electricity network

With the increasing levels of rooftop Photovoltaic systems, the energy flow becomes 2-way. When there is more local generation than consumption, electricity is exported to the grid. However, electricity network traditionally is not designed to deal with the 2- way energy transfer. Therefore, some technical issues may occur. For example, in Queensland Australia, there have been more than 30% of households with rooftop PV by the end of 2017. The famous Californian 2020 duck curve appears very often for a lot of communities from 2015 onwards. An over-voltage issue may come out as the electricity flows back to the network.[159] There are solutions to manage the over voltage issue, such as regulating PV inverter power factor, new voltage and energy control equipment at electricity distributor level, re-conductor the electricity wires, demand side management, etc. There are often limitations and costs related to these solutions.

Implication onto electricity bill management and energy investment

Customers have different specific situations, e.g. different comfort/convenience needs, different electricity tariffs, or different usage patterns. An electricity tariff may have a few elements, such as daily access and metering charge, energy charge (based on kWh, MWh) or peak demand charge (e.g. a price for the highest 30min energy consumption in a month). PV is a promising option for reducing energy charge when electricity price is reasonably high and continuously increasing, such as in Australia and Germany. However, for sites with peak demand charge in place, PV may be less attractive if peak demands mostly occur in the late afternoon to early evening, for example residential communities. Overall, energy investment is largely an economic decision and investment decisions are based on systematical evaluation of options in operational improvement, energy efficiency, onsite generation and energy storage.[160][161]


  1. “Photovoltaics Report” (PDF). Fraunhofer ISE. 28 July 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 August 2014. Retrieved 31 August 2014.
  2. Service Lifetime Prediction for Encapsulated Photovoltaic Cells/Minimodules, A.W. Czanderna and G.J. Jorgensen, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
  3. M. Bazilian; I. Onyeji; M. Liebreich; et al. (2013). “Re-considering the economics of photovoltaic power” (PDF). Renewable Energy (53). Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 August 2014. Retrieved 31 August 2014.
  4. “Photovoltaic System Pricing Trends – Historical, Recent, and Near-Term Projections, 2014 Edition” (PDF). NREL. 22 September 2014. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 March 2015.
  5. “Photovoltaik-Preisindex” [Solar PV price index]. PhotovoltaikGuide. Archived from the original on 10 July 2017. Retrieved 30 March 2015. Turnkey net-prices for a solar PV system of up to 100 kilowatts amounted to Euro 1,240 per kWp.
  6. Fraunhofer ISE Levelized Cost of Electricity Study, November 2013, p. 19
  7. (2014). “Technology Roadmap: Solar Photovoltaic Energy” (PDF). IEA. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 October 2014. Retrieved 7 October 2014.
  8. “Global Market Outlook for Photovoltaics 2014-2018” (PDF). EPIA – European Photovoltaic Industry Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 June 2014. Retrieved 12 June 2014.
  9. Joern Hoppmann; Jonas Volland; Tobias S. Schmidt; Volker H. Hoffmann (July 2014). “The Economic Viability of Battery Storage for Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems – A Review and a Simulation Model”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 39: 1101–1118. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.068. Retrieved December 28, 2018.
  10. FORBES, Justin Gerdes, Solar Energy Storage About To Take Off In Germany and California, 18 July 2013
  11. US Solar Market Grew 41%, Had Record Year in 2013 | Greentech Media
  12. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st century (REN21), Renewables 2010 Global Status Report, Paris, 2010, pp. 1–80.
  13. Branker, K.; Pathak, M.J.M.; Pearce, J.M. (2011). “A Review of Solar Photovoltaic Levelized Cost of Electricity”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15 (9): 4470–4482. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.104. hdl:1974/6879. S2CID 73523633.
  14. “Levelized Cost of Electricity—Renewable Energy Technologies” (PDF). Fraunhofer ISE. November 2013. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 August 2014. Retrieved 3 August 2014.
  15. “Crossing the Chasm” (PDF). Deutsche Bank Markets Research. 27 February 2015. p. 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 April 2015.
  16. Tam Hunt (9 March 2015). “The Solar Singularity Is Nigh”. Greentech Media. Retrieved 29 April 2015.
  17. “Snapshot of Global PV 1992-2014” (PDF). International Energy Agency — Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme. 30 March 2015. Archived from the original on 30 March 2015.
  18. “Photovoltaic… Cell, Module, String, Array” (PDF). WordPower—Ian Woofenden. 2006. Retrieved December 28, 2018.
  19. Residential, Commercial, and Utility-Scale Photovoltaic (PV) System Prices in the United States, p.6 February 2012
  20. Types of PV systems. Florida Solar Energy Center (FSEC), a research institute of the University of Central Florida.
  21. Rahmani, R.; Fard, M.; Shojaei, A.A.; Othman, M.F.; Yusof, R., A complete model of stand-alone photovoltaic array in MATLAB-Simulink environment, 2011 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), pp 46–51, 2011.
  22. Army evaluating transportable solar-powered tents | Article | The United States Army. (2010-12-08). Retrieved on 2013-07-17.
  23. RV Solar Electric
  24. Go Power Electric RV and Marine Solar Power Solutions
  25. Samlex Solar
  26. “RV Solar Guide”. Retrieved 2018-08-15.
  27. MacKenzie, Pam (July 1, 2014). “PSE&G completes utility-pole solar installation”. MY CENTRAL JERSEY. Retrieved December 29, 2018.
  28. Andrews, Rob W; Pollard, Andrew; Pearce, Joshua M (2012). “Improved parametric empirical determination of module short circuit current for modelling and optimization of solar photovoltaic systems”. Solar Energy. 86 (9): 2240. Bibcode:2012SoEn…86.2240A. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2012.04.016.
  29. Andrews, Rob W; Pearce, Joshua M (2012). “Prediction of energy effects on photovoltaic systems due to snowfall events” (PDF). 2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference. p. 003386. doi:10.1109/PVSC.2012.6318297. ISBN 978-1-4673-0066-7. S2CID 40053323.
  30. Andrews, Rob W.; Pollard, Andrew; Pearce, Joshua M. (2013). “The Effects of Snowfall on Solar Photovoltaic Performance”. Solar Energy. 92 (8497): 84–97. Bibcode:2013SoEn…92…84A. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2013.02.014.
  31. Andrews, Rob W; Pollard, Andrew; Pearce, Joshua M (2013). “A new method to determine the effects of hydrodynamic surface coatings on the snow shedding effectiveness of solar photovoltaic modules”. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 113: 71–78. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2013.01.032.
  32. Heidari, Negin; Gwamuri, Jephias; Townsend, Tim; Pearce, Joshua M (2015). “Impact of Snow and Ground Interference on Photovoltaic Electric System Performance” (PDF). IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 5 (6): 1680. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2466448. S2CID 45625281.
  33. Shubbak, Mahmood (2018). Forging Ahead: Technology Development and Emerging Economies. Universität Bremen. pp. 41–46.
  34. Shubbak, Mahmood H. (2019-11-01). “Advances in solar photovoltaics: Technology review and patent trends”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 115: 109383. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109383. ISSN 1364-0321.
  35. PV Module Materials
  36. Key Factors in selecting solar components
  37. List of Eligible SB1 Guidelines Compliant Photovoltaic Modules
  38. “Solar Power (Photovoltaic, PV)”. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Archived from the original on 16 September 2010. Retrieved 5 February 2010.
  39. The Worst Metric in Renewables: ‘The Payback Period’. Renewable Energy World (2010-04-19). Retrieved on 2012-10-01.
  40. It’s payback time for home generation. BBC News (2010-06-22). Retrieved on 2012-04-23.
  41. “Solar Panel Comparison Table”. Retrieved 2012-10-21.
  42. Andresen, Bjarne; R. Stephen Berry (May 1977). “Thermodynamics in finite time. I. The step-Carnot cycle”. Physical Review A. 15 (5): 2086–2093. Bibcode:1977PhRvA..15.2086A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.15.2086.
  43. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems. “World Record Solar Cell with 44.7% Efficiency”. Fraunhofer ISE.
  44. “Concentrix Solar: Concentrator Modules”. Archived from the original on 2016-01-26. Retrieved 2008-12-03.
  45. CPV Solar Cell Reach 27% System Efficiency
  46. Kajihara, Atsushi, and A. T. Harakawa. “Model of photovoltaic cell circuits under partial shading.” Industrial Technology, 2005. ICIT 2005. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2005.
  47. Drif, M.; Perez, P. J.; Aguilera, J.; Aguilar, J. D. (2008). “A new estimation method of irradiance on a partially shaded PV generator in grid-connected photovoltaic systems”. Renewable Energy. 33 (9): 2048–2056. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2007.12.010.
  48. VENTRE, JERRY AUTOR. Photovoltaic systems engineering. CRC press, 2004.
  49. Ursula Eicker, Solar Technologies for Buildings, Wiley 2003, ISBN 0-471-48637-X, page 226
  50. Nguyen, Ha T; Pearce, Joshua M (2012). “Incorporating shading losses in solar photovoltaic potential assessment at the municipal scale”. Solar Energy. 86 (5): 1245. Bibcode:2012SoEn…86.1245N. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2012.01.017. S2CID 15435496.
  51. Dereli, Z; Yücedağ, C; Pearce, J.M (2013). “Simple and low-cost method of planning for tree growth and lifetime effects on solar photovoltaic systems performance”. Solar Energy. 95: 300–307. Bibcode:2013SoEn…95..300D. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2013.06.019.
  52. Ilse K, Micheli L, Figgis BW, Lange K, Dassler D, Hanifi H, Wolfertstetter F, Naumann V, Hagendorf C, Gottschalg R, Bagdahn J (2019). “Techno-Economic Assessment of Soiling Losses and Mitigation Strategies for Solar Power Generation”. Joule. 3 (10): 2303–2321. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.019.
  53. “Photovoltaic Module Soiling Map”. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 2017-10-11. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
  54. Li X, Mauzerall D, Bergin M (2020). “Global reduction of solar power generation efficiency due to aerosols and panel soiling”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (9): 720–727. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0553-2. Retrieved 2020-12-04.
  55. Boyle L, et al. (2017). “Regional and National Scale Spatial Variability of Photovoltaic Cover Plate Soiling and Subsequent Solar Transmission Losses”. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 7 (5): 1354–1361. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2731939. Retrieved 2018-04-18.
  56. Gostein M, et al. (2018). “Local Variability in PV Soiling Rate”. 2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC): 3421–3425. doi:10.1109/PVSC.2018.8548049. Retrieved 2020-12-04.
  57. Should you spring clean your solar panels?
  58. Santbergen, R; R.J.C. van Zolingen (22 October 2007). “The absorption factor of crystalline silicon PV cells: A numerical and experimental study”. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells.
  59. El-Sharkawi, Mohamed A. (2005). Electric energy. CRC Press. pp. 87–88. ISBN 978-0-8493-3078-0.
  60. Optimum Tilt of Solar Panels Archived 2015-08-11 at the Wayback Machine
  61. Stand Alone Photovoltaic Lighting Systems
  62. Andrews, Rob W.; Pearce, Joshua M. (2013). “The effect of spectral albedo on amorphous silicon and crystalline silicon solar photovoltaic device performance”. Solar Energy. 91: 233–241. Bibcode:2013SoEn…91..233A. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2013.01.030.
  63. Brennan, M.P.; Abramase, A.L.; Andrews, R.W.; Pearce, J. M. (2014). “Effects of spectral albedo on solar photovoltaic devices”. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 124: 111–116. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2014.01.046.
  64. Sahara’s solar power potential underlined Archived 2013-06-30 at the Wayback Machine
  65. A Performance Calculator. Retrieved on 2012-04-23.
  66. Technological advantages Archived 2012-04-06 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 2012-04-23.
  67. Al-Mohamad, Ali (2004). “Efficiency improvements of photo-voltaic panels using a Sun-tracking system”. Applied Energy. 79 (3): 345–354. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2003.12.004.
  68. Shining More Light on Solar Panels. Retrieved on 2018-04-25.
  69. Reflective Coating Silicon Solar Cells Boosts Absorption Over 96 Percent. (2008-11-03). Retrieved on 2012-04-23.
  70. Beginners’ Guide to Solar Trackers: How to Increase Output for Your Home Solar Panel System, 17 August 2011 (archived)
  71. “Insolation Levels (Europe)”. Archived from the original on 2012-04-17. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  72. 10 years Average Insolation Data
  73. Utility Scale Solar Power Plants
  74. Should You Install a Solar Tracker?
  76. Grid-Tied Inverter Safety. Retrieved on 2012-04-23.
  77. Trend watch: Microinverters invade solar
  78. Services and Solutions for Photovoltaic Systems
  79. “PHOTOVOLTAICS REPORT” (PDF). Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems. 16 September 2020. p. 39.
  80. All About Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT)
  81. Solar power anti-islanding and control, 7 August 2012
  82. “Tesla launches Powerwall home battery with aim to revolutionize energy consumption”. Associated Press. May 1, 2015.
  83. Dan Fink, Charge Controller Buyer’s Guide, January 2012
  84. Residential Photovoltaic Metering and Interconnection Study
  85. Integrating Variable Renewable Energy in Electric Power Markets
  86. Smart PV Inverter Benefits for Utilities
  87. Enphase Solar Monitoring
  88. Solar Irradiance Measurements
  89. Pearce, Joshua. M; Adegboyega Babasola; Rob Andrews (2012). “Open Solar Photovoltaic Systems Optimization”. Proceedings of the 16th Annual National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance Conference: 1–7.
  90. CSI—Metering and Performance Monitoring Archived 2012-08-10 at the Wayback Machine
  91. Solar Energy
  92. SolarGuard
  93. PV resources website Archived 2010-11-28 at the Wayback Machine, Hybrid power station accessed 10 Feb 08
  94. “Daten und Fakten”. Archived from the original on July 19, 2011. Retrieved 2008-02-10.. Pellworm island website (in German)
  95. Darul’a, Ivan; Stefan Marko (2007). “Large scale integration of renewable electricity production into the grids” (PDF). Journal of Electrical Engineering. 58 (1): 58–60. ISSN 1335-3632. Retrieved 2008-02-10.
  96. “New study: Hybridising electricity grids with solar PV saves costs, especially benefits state-owned utilities”. 31 May 2015. Archived from the original on 26 July 2015.
  97. “Renewable Energy in Hybrid Mini-Grids and Isolated Grids: Economic Benefits and Business Cases”. Frankfurt School – UNEP Collaborating Centre for Climate & Sustainable Energy Finance. May 2015. Archived from the original on 2018-08-20. Retrieved 2015-06-01.
  98. J. M. Pearce (2009). “Expanding Photovoltaic Penetration with Residential Distributed Generation from Hybrid Solar Photovoltaic + Combined Heat and Power Systems”. Energy. 34 (11): 1947–1954. CiteSeerX doi:10.1016/ hdl:1974/5307.
  99. P. Derewonko and J.M. Pearce, “Optimizing Design of Household Scale Hybrid Solar Photovoltaic + Combined Heat and Power Systems for Ontario”, Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2009 34th IEEE, pp.1274–1279, 7–12 June 2009.
  100. Mostofi, A. H. Nosrat, and J. M. Pearce, “Institutional-Scale Operational Symbiosis of Photovoltaic and Cogeneration Energy Systems” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 8(1), pp. 31–44, 2011. Available open access: [1]
  101. A novel solar CPV/CSP hybrid system proposed, 11 February 2015
  102. Amanda Cain (22 January 2014). “What Is a Photovoltaic Diesel Hybrid System?”. Archived from the original on 25 May 2017.
  103. “Hybrid Wind and Solar Electric Systems”. DOE. 2 July 2012.
  104. Pringle, Adam M; Handler, R.M; Pearce, J.M (2017). “Aquavoltaics: Synergies for dual use of water area for solar photovoltaic electricity generation and aquaculture” (PDF). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 80: 572–584. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.191.
  105. “Kyocera, partners announce construction of the world’s largest floating solar PV Plant in Hyogo prefecture, Japan”. 4 September 2014. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
  106. “Running Out of Precious Land? Floating Solar PV Systems May Be a Solution”. 7 November 2013.
  107. “Vikram Solar commissions India’s first floating PV plant”. 13 January 2015. Archived from the original on 2 March 2015.
  108. “Sunflower Floating Solar Power Plant In Korea”. CleanTechnica. 21 December 2014.
  109. “Short Of Land, Singapore Opts For Floating Solar Power Systems”. CleanTechnica. 5 May 2014.
  110. Erica Goodemay, New Solar Plants Generate Floating Green Power, New York Times, 20 May 2016.
  111. “Winery goes solar with Floatovoltaics”. SFGate. 29 May 2008. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
  112. “Napa Valley’s Far Niente Winery Introduces first-ever Floatovoltaic solar array” (PDF). Far Niente. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-03-16.
  113. “Napa Winery Pioneers Solar Floatovoltaics”. Forbes. 18 April 2012. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
  114. “Yamakura Dam in Chiba Prefecture”. The Japan Dam Foundation. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
  115. Kyocera and Century Tokyo Leasing to Develop 13.4MW Floating Solar Power Plant on Reservoir in Chiba Prefecture, Japan, Kyocera, December 22, 2014
  116. New Solar Plants Generate Floating Green Power NYT May 20, 2016
  117. Solar Panels Floating on Water Could Power Japan’s Homes, National Geographic, Bryan Lufkin, January 16, 2015
  118. Anand Upadhyay (6 April 2015). “Brazil Announces Huge 350 MW Floating Solar Power Plant”.
  119. “Innovative Electrical Concepts” (PDF). Archived from the original on March 18, 2009. Retrieved 2008-02-11.. International Energy Agency (2001)
  120. site7. Retrieved on 2012-04-23.
  121. Ramirez Camargo, Luis; Nitsch, Felix; Gruber, Katharina; Dorner, Wolfgang (2018-10-15). “Electricity self-sufficiency of single-family houses in Germany and the Czech Republic”. Applied Energy. 228: 902–915. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.118. ISSN 0306-2619.
  122. “Pico Solar PV Systems for Remote Homes – A new generation of small PV systems for lighting and communication” (PDF). IEA-PVPS. January 2014.
  123. B.H Khan, ‘Non-Conventional Energy Resources’, TMH Publications 01-01-2006
  124. ‘Pay bill for 4 months, get power for 25 years’
  125. “Pumping Water with Sunshine”. Retrieved 7 January 2014.
  126. “Solar Well Pumps”. Retrieved 7 January 2014.
  127. “Space-Based Solar Power”. 6 March 2014. Retrieved 29 April 2015.
  128. “History of Solar Energy”. Retrieved 29 April 2015.
  129. People building their own solar systems from kits. Retrieved on 2012-04-23.
  130. Example of diy PV system with pictures. (2007-11-05). Retrieved on 2012-04-23.
  131. Graham, Michael. (2005-10-15) Low-cost PV solar kit preferred by diy-communities. Retrieved on 2012-04-23.
  132. Ken Darrow and Mike Saxenian “Appropriate Technology Sourcebook”. Archived from the original on September 22, 2010. Retrieved 2015-08-05..
  133. “Alternative Energy Development: Michigan will be Nation’s Leader in Alternative Energy Technology, Jobs” (PDF). State of Michigan, Office Of The Governor. Retrieved February 22, 2012.
  134. “Comparing Photovoltaic (PV) Costs and Deployment Drivers in the Japanese and U.S. Residential and Commercial Markets” (PDF). June 2014. pp. 16, 27. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2014. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
  135. “History of average turn-key prices for rooftop PV systems up to 100 kWp in Germany., pv-preisindex since 2009 Archived 2017-07-10 at the Wayback Machine, using month of January figures, and Bundesverband Solarwirtschaft e.V. (BSW-Solar), September 2009, page 4, quarterly figures from EUPD-Researchfor, data for years 2006–2008. Used exchange rate of 0.74 euro-cents per US$.
  136. John Quiggin (January 3, 2012). “The End of the Nuclear Renaissance |”. National Interest.
  137. “Solar photovoltaics: Competing in the energy sector”. European Photovoltaic Industry Association (EPIA). 2011-09-01. Archived from the original on 2014-11-03. Retrieved 2014-04-05.
  138. A Comparison of PV Technologies Archived 2012-07-09 at the Wayback Machine
  139. p = I ⋅ ( 1 + i ) + ∑ t = 0 T I ⋅ b ( 1 + i ) t ∑ t = 0 T E ⋅ ( 1 − v ) t ( 1 + i ) t {\displaystyle p={\frac {I\cdot (1+i)+\sum _{t=0}^{T}{\frac {I\cdot b}{(1+i)^{t}}}}{\sum _{t=0}^{T}{\frac {E\cdot (1-v)^{t}}{(1+i)^{t}}}}}}
  140. What is Levelized Cost?
  141. “PV price index Germany”. Archived from the original on 2017-07-10. Retrieved 2014-08-21.
  142. PV operation and maintenance costs. (PDF) . Retrieved on 2012-04-23.
  143. Solar PV warranties
  144. Understanding Solar Panel Warrantees
  145. Map-Photovoltaic Resource of the United States
  146. “Learning Curve Analysis: Solar PV to be the Cheapest Renewables in 2024 – Inspecro Blog”. Inspecro Blog. 2018-05-05. Retrieved 2018-05-15.
  147. “Renewable Power Generation Costs 2017” (PDF). International Renewable Energy Agency.
  148. “Renewable Capacity Statistics 2018” (PDF). International Renewable Energy Agency.
  149. Regan Arndt and Dr. Ing Robert Puto. Basic Understanding of IEC Standard Testing For Photovoltaic Panels. Available:
  150. Solar Panels. Planning Portal. Retrieved on 2013-07-17.
  151. Solar Power World
  152. “Requirements for Solar Installations”. 2011. Retrieved March 31, 2011.
  153. “California Solar Rights Act”. Archived from the original on October 19, 2012. Retrieved February 25, 2012.
  154. “Solar does work within HOAs, but installers have to stay vigilant”. Solar Power World. 2018-08-13. Retrieved 2019-11-17.
  155. “The Ins and Outs of Solar Panels In HOA Communities”. Homeowners Protection Bureau, LLC. Retrieved 2019-11-17.
  156. Hunt, Tam (7 February 2011). “Spain and Portugal Lead the Way on Renewable Energy Transformation”. Renewable Energy World.
  157. Phillips Erb, Kelly (19 August 2013). “Out Of Ideas And In Debt, Spain Sets Sights On Taxing The Sun”. Forbes. Retrieved 20 November 2014.
  158. Jiménez, Javiier. “Así queda la regulación del autoconsumo en España tras la eliminación del “impuesto al sol””. Xataka. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
  159. W. Miller, A. L. Liu, Z. Amin, and A. Wagner, “Power quality and rooftop-PV households: an examination of measured data at point of customer connection,” Sustainability, (Open Access), p. 29, 2018.
  160. L. Liu, W. Miller, and G. Ledwich (October 27, 2017). “Solutions for reducing facility electricity costs”. Australian Ageing Agenda. Archived from the original on May 20, 2019. Retrieved December 29, 2018.
  161. Miller, Wendy; Liu, Lei Aaron; Amin, Zakaria; Gray, Matthew (2018). “Involving occupants in net-zero-energy solar housing retrofits: An Australian sub-tropical case study”. Solar Energy. 159: 390–404. Bibcode:2018SoEn..159..390M. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.10.008.

This page is based on a Wikipedia article written by contributors (read/edit).
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

Cover photo is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 license. Credit: AleSpa (see original file).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *